Task4.4 - BGP Filtering
Q1.) Instead of using "ip as-path" and "filter-list" on both R3 and R4? Can i do the opposite way, by applying "ip as-path" and "filter-list" on R1
ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^200$
router bgp 300
neighbor 126.96.36.199 filter-list 1 out
neighbor 188.8.131.52 filter-list 1 out
Q2.) Task mentioned DO NOT use IP access-list or prefix-list. If allowed to do so, do we just use either access-list or prefix-list to match the BGP routes generated by BB2 and BB3, and followed by using a distribute-list?
Why is there isnt 'next-hop-self' on R3 to its ibgp neighbor R2, whereas R6 is using 'next-hop-self' to R2 within ibgp?
router bgp 200
neighbor 184.108.40.206 next-hop-self