sham-link issue in dynagen

AnonymousAnonymous
in GNS3/Dynamips

please tell me can sham-link be used in dynagen or not??

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • AdamBoothAdamBooth

    Yes they can

    Here's a relatively simple test I just did using this topology

    R1(CE)===R2(PE)===R3(PE)===R4(PE)

    R3#sh ver | i IOS

    Cisco IOS Software, 3700 Software (C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)


    R1
    ---
    hostname R1
    interface Loopback0
     ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
     ip ospf 1 area 1
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
     description R2 Fa0/0
     ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 1 area 1
    !

    R2
    ---
    hostname R2
    ip vrf A
     rd 1:1
     route-target export 1:1
     route-target import 1:1
    interface Loopback0
     ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
     ip ospf 1 area 0
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
     description R1 Fa0/0
     ip vrf forwarding A
     ip address 10.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 2 area 1
     speed 100
     full-duplex
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/1
     description R3 Fa0/1
     ip address 10.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 1 area 0
     mpls ip
    !
    interface Loopback23
     description SHAMLink Interface
     ip vrf forwarding A
     ip address 23.23.23.2 255.255.255.255
    !
    router ospf 2 vrf A
     log-adjacency-changes
     redistribute bgp 23 subnets
    !
    router ospf 1
     log-adjacency-changes
    !
    router ospf 2 vrf A
     log-adjacency-changes
     area 1 sham-link 23.23.23.2 23.23.23.3
     redistribute bgp 23 subnets
    !
    router bgp 23
     no bgp default ipv4-unicast
     bgp log-neighbor-changes
     neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 23
     neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0
     !
     address-family vpnv4
      neighbor 3.3.3.3 activate
      neighbor 3.3.3.3 send-community extended
     exit-address-family
     !
     address-family ipv4 vrf A
      redistribute ospf 2 vrf A
      no synchronization
      network 23.23.23.2 mask 255.255.255.255
     exit-address-family
    !

    R3
    ---
    hostname R3
    ip vrf A
     rd 1:1
     route-target export 1:1
     route-target import 1:1
    interface Loopback0
     ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
     ip ospf 1 area 0
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
     description R4 Fa0/0
     ip vrf forwarding A
     ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 3 area 1
     speed 100
     full-duplex
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/1
     description R2 Fa0/1
     ip address 10.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 1 area 0
     mpls ip
    !
    interface Loopback23
     description SHAMLink Interface
     ip vrf forwarding A
     ip address 23.23.23.3 255.255.255.255
    !
    router ospf 1
     log-adjacency-changes
    !
    router ospf 3 vrf A
     log-adjacency-changes
     area 1 sham-link 23.23.23.3 23.23.23.2
     redistribute bgp 23 subnets
    !
    router bgp 23
     no bgp default ipv4-unicast
     bgp log-neighbor-changes
     neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 23
     neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0
     !
     address-family vpnv4
      neighbor 2.2.2.2 activate
      neighbor 2.2.2.2 send-community extended
     exit-address-family
     !
     address-family ipv4 vrf A
      redistribute ospf 3 vrf A
      no synchronization
      network 23.23.23.3 mask 255.255.255.255
     exit-address-family
    !

    R4
    ---
    hostname R4
    interface Loopback0
     ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.255
     ip ospf 1 area 1
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
     description R3 Fa0/0
     ip address 10.1.34.4 255.255.255.0
     ip ospf 1 area 1
    !

     

    R1>sh ip route | b Gateway
    Gateway of last resort is not set

         1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C       1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback0
         4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    O       4.4.4.4 [110/4] via 10.1.12.2, 00:00:39, FastEthernet0/0
         23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    O E2    23.23.23.3 [110/1] via 10.1.12.2, 00:02:55, FastEthernet0/0
    O E2    23.23.23.2 [110/1] via 10.1.12.2, 00:03:54, FastEthernet0/0
         10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    C       10.1.12.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
    O       10.1.34.0 [110/3] via 10.1.12.2, 00:00:39, FastEthernet0/0

    R4>sh ip route | b Gateway
    Gateway of last resort is not set

         1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    O       1.1.1.1 [110/4] via 10.1.34.3, 00:00:49, FastEthernet0/0
         4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    C       4.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
         23.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    O E2    23.23.23.3 [110/1] via 10.1.34.3, 00:03:06, FastEthernet0/0
    O E2    23.23.23.2 [110/1] via 10.1.34.3, 00:04:01, FastEthernet0/0
         10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
    O       10.1.12.0 [110/3] via 10.1.34.3, 00:00:49, FastEthernet0/0
    C       10.1.34.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

    The E2 routes appear because they are the loopbacks used for the shamlinks and a redistributed from BGP into OSPF - you could remove them from appearing to the CEs by using a route-map when doing the redistribution

     

     

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.