My solution is a bit different then what's in solution guide. I am interested if i would loose point if i did it this way in the lab.
For example, the task was to prioritize voice packets, but there is no mentioning as to what amount of bandwidth that relates to. Task before that specificaly asked to make sure users in vlan 11 get 80% bandwidth of CIR = 307kbps. This leaves 77 kbps for shaper queue. I decided to give voice packets enough BW for 5 compressed G.729 calls which is exactly 58 kbps. And while shaper is configured for 512kbps, i made sure it drops to minCir if there are packets in LLQ.
This is common sense, but i need to know if this extra config will make me loose points. It technically doesn't break any requirements unless i missed something.
class-map match-all VOICE
match ip rtp 16384 16383
map-class frame-relay DLCI_501
frame-relay fragment 640
service-policy output SHAPER
bandwidth percent 80
shape average 512000 5120 0
shape adaptive 384000
shape fr-voice-adapt deactivation 30
interface Serial1/0.501 point-to-point
ip address 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
frame-relay ip tcp header-compression
frame-relay ip rtp header-compression