in
IEOC CCIE Forums

IEOC - INE's Online Community

Welcome to INE's Online Community - IEOC - a place for CCIE and CCENT candidates to connect, share, and learn. Our Online Community features CCIE forums and discussions for all tracks including Routing & Switching, Voice, Security, Service Provider, Wireless,, and Storage. Through these online communities you can discuss your questions with thousands of your peers, hundreds of CCIE's and INE's own team of world renowned CCIE instructors and authors, Brian Dennis - Quintuple CCIE #2210, Brian McGahan – Triple CCIE #8593, Petr Lapukhov - Quad CCIE #16379, and Mark Snow - Dual CCIE #14073.
Latest post 05-22-2015 7:27 PM by dparag. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-04-2014 3:32 PM

    EIGRP stub

    Task 7.3 suggests setting R16 and R17 as EIGRP stub to prevent the hub router R18 from sending QUERY packets in case a route goes active. I agree that this is the desired method, but there is a problem with the "servers", i.e. the VRFs on R15. If you do as the solution guide suggests, R15 loses all of his routes beyond the DMVPN spoke routers.

    I originally thought I would include summary routes and advertise a default towards R15, but this breaks OSPF on R16. I'm wondering if any of you have an opinion on how to get around this problem. Perhaps we could add all the routes received via R18 into a leak-map.

    CCIE #45404 (R/S)

    • Post Points: 35
  • 10-06-2014 11:01 AM In reply to

    • plucena24
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-10-2012
    • Mountain View, CA
    • Elite
    • Points 16,865

    Re: EIGRP stub

    The task solutions have been slightly modified to account for this issue - please revisit the solution. 

    2xCCIE #38211 (RS/SP)

    • Post Points: 20
  • 10-06-2014 11:45 AM In reply to

    Re: EIGRP stub

    Looks good - thanks!

    CCIE #45404 (R/S)

    • Post Points: 5
  • 05-22-2015 7:27 PM In reply to

    Re: EIGRP stub

    I solved this lab recently and my solution was exactly to use a leak-map, since I didn't think about using summarization. Here is what I did on R16 and R17 and worked fine so far: (I know some prefix-list lines may not be necessary on both but time is money Geeked)

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 172.23.160.0/24

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 172.25.170.0/24

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 172.27.192.0/24

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 192.122.3.17/32

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 192.122.3.19/32

    ip prefix-list PL_LEAK permit 192.122.3.20/32

    !

    route-map RM_LEAK permit 10

     match ip address prefix PL_LEAK

    !

    router eigrp 123

     eigrp stub connected redistribute leak-map RM_LEAK

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
IEOC CCIE Forums Internetwork Expert CCIE Training
About IEOC | Terms of Use | RSS | Privacy Policy
© 2010 Internetwork Expert, Inc. All Rights Reserved