in

IEOC - Internetwork Expert's Online Community

Welcome to Internetwork Expert's Online Community - IEOC - a place for CCIE and CCENT candidates to connect, share, and learn. Our Online Community features CCIE forums and discussions for all tracks including Routing & Switching, Voice, Security, Service Provider, and Storage. Through these online communities you can discuss your questions with thousands of your peers, hundreds of CCIE's and Internetwork Expert's own team of world renowned CCIE instructors and authors, Brian Dennis - Quintuple CCIE #2210, Scott Morris - Quad CCIE #4713, Brian McGahan – Triple CCIE #8593, Petr Lapukhov - Quad CCIE #16379, Anthony Sequeira - CCIE #15626, Keith Barker - Dual CCIE #6783, and Marvin Greenlee - Triple CCIE #12237.
Latest post 06-13-2010 6:30 AM by tommoser. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 03-26-2010 11:35 AM

    OSPF 6.30

    I am doing OSPF labs right now and have been reading the explanation for 6.30 (Page 167) which states:

    [..] When the route moves between areas, each ABR originates a Type-4 ASBR Summary LSA advertising their reachability to the ASBR. This means that for all Type-5 External LSA inter-area lookups OSPF would require  Ext_Routes + Num_ABRs + Num_Routers LSAs. [..]

     

    In my opinion, if the first sentence holds true, meaning that each ABR generates Type-4 LSA for each ASBR (described by LSA-1), then the number of LSAs is Ext_Routes + (Num_Routers * Num_ABRs) + Num_Routers.

     

    On the next page we read:

    [..] Let's suppose for the sake of argument that each ABR connecting to the NSSA to area 0 did do a translation of Type-7 to 5. This would mean for all inter-area lookups on Type-5 External LSAs that were translated from Type7-, there would be (NSSA_Routes * Num_ABRs) + Num_ABRs + Num_Routers LSAs [..]

     

    I think, that if there is no LSA Type-4 generated on ABR for NSSA, the Num_ABRs in the formula is not neccessary, it should be:  (NSSA_Routes * Num_ABRs) + Num_Routers

     

    Anyone willing to comment on this?

     

    Many thanks, 

     

    Sebastian

    • Post Points: 20
  • 06-13-2010 6:30 AM In reply to

    Re: OSPF 6.30

    Guys,

    Some of you may have come up with a slightly modified solution than SG offers using "route summrization" on R3.

    This will make R5 prefer route to 150.1.9.9 via R6 because /32 host route will be preferred to summarized route from R3. Works for failover too.

    # R3

    router ospf 1

    area 2 range 150.1.9.0 255.255.255.0

     

    Tom

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
IEOC CCIE Forums Internetwork Expert CCIE Training
About IEOC | Terms of Use | RSS | Privacy Policy
© 2010 Internetwork Expert, Inc. All Rights Reserved