<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ieoc.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>CCIE R&amp;S Lab Workbook Volume I Version 5.0</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/86.aspx</link><description>IEWB-RS Volume 1 Version 5.0</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Question about diagram</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/104469.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:36:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:104469</guid><dc:creator>mrobinson2</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/104469.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=104469</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is in regards to the Vol1 Diagram:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I supposed to figure out what devices are included in each IGP protocol if they are not included
in the workbook diagram for vol 1?&amp;nbsp; I included a pic of the volume 2 so
that you can see the difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marc Robinson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://ieoc.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.82.72/Vol2.bmp" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://ieoc.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.82.72/Vol1.bmp" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>IP SLA help</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/104039.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:05:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:104039</guid><dc:creator>srchang</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/104039.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=104039</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, hoping someone can help answer why I&amp;#39;m getting config discrepencies using my rack.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m running the same code as the INE rack, adv enterprise 12.4(24)T on 2811&amp;#39;s but the INE configs show:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip sla monitor 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; type jitter dest-ipaddr 155.1.45.5 dest-port 16384 codec g729a&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; timeout 1000&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; frequency 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My configs look like this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip sla 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; udp-jitter 155.1.45.5 16384 codec g729a&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, I&amp;#39;m getting errors when trying to set the timeout to 1000, says my timeout can&amp;#39;t be less than the threshold of 5000 and I can&amp;#39;t set my frequency to 1, I&amp;#39;m seeing an error saying my frequency is less than the timeout.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help is much appreciated, as I&amp;#39;m having issues doing the validations for the QOS section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>John Senkiw's IBM mailbox is no longer in use!!</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/102235.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:07:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:102235</guid><dc:creator>John Senkiw</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/102235.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=102235</wfw:commentRss><description>I will be out of the office starting  29/12/2009 and will not return until&lt;br /&gt;
31/12/2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This IBM mailbox is no longer in use!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please send all mail to AT&amp;amp;T email john.senkiw@att.com.</description></item><item><title>Interface or IP hop</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/102232.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:48:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:102232</guid><dc:creator>Malificus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/102232.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=102232</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;quick question, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i am having issues around the wording on the some of the workbooks, for example, when it says this, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Configure R4 and R5 with identical static routes for each others Loopback0 networks out of their frame relay connections and point to point connections between them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statement above,&amp;nbsp;does this mean use an interface as the next hop? or does it mean use an IP address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also will this matter on the real lab aslong as ip reachability is gained?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Initial configs clarification</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/81613.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:02:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:81613</guid><dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/81613.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=81613</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve opened a support ticket on this as well and i hope someone else here has resolved this,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I struggle at times wondering which initial config set to use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my login account, under Vol 1 (ver 5.0 labs) there is a master initial configuration file then there are initial configuration files listed under some of the technologies. Example, for multicast, under the master initial config set, there are initial configs. Then on the multicast folder, another initial config set exist. In comparing both, they are different. Which should i be using?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>CCIE v.4      IMPORTANT TOPIC ,  PLEASE  IDENTIFY.................</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/75422.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:26:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:75422</guid><dc:creator>sred10</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/75422.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=75422</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi All,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can some one help me on identifying below topic in R&amp;amp;S WB v5,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; in volume one of IEWB&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;=&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Implement Performance Routing (PfR) and Cisco Optimized Edge Routing (OER) &amp;lt;==&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;topic number or any indexing would be very much appreciated, as Its the new edition, I cant find any thing, and would like to practice this topic as well from new ccie blueprint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>QoS Legacy Stuff (Lab Blueprint v4.0 &lt;-&gt; IE WB1-v5)</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/30708.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:17:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:30708</guid><dc:creator>nry</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/30708.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=30708</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m just asking myself if the old legacy QoS stuff in workbook I version 5 (10.1 - 10.26) is on the new v4.0 lab-exam.&lt;br /&gt;Its nice to have such a huge QoS section for learning, but I want to concentrate on the main parts.&lt;br /&gt;Also the Catalyst 3550 QoS should not be on the exam anymore.&lt;br /&gt;The next point is, that the blueprint says MDRR is on the exam, but it&amp;#39;s only supported on 12000 GSR router as far as I know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW LAB-BLUEPRINT QOS:&lt;br /&gt;8.00&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement Quality of Service (QoS)&lt;br /&gt;8.10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement Modular QoS CLI (MQC) &lt;br /&gt;(a) Network-Based Application Recognition (NBAR)&lt;br /&gt;(b) Class-based weighted fair queuing (CBWFQ),&amp;nbsp; modified deficit round robin (MDRR), and low latency &lt;br /&gt;queuing (LLQ)&lt;br /&gt;(c) Classification&lt;br /&gt;(d) Policing&lt;br /&gt;(e) Shaping&lt;br /&gt;(f) Marking&lt;br /&gt;(g) Weighted random early detection (WRED) and random early detection (RED)&lt;br /&gt;(h) Compression&lt;br /&gt;8.20&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement Layer 2 QoS: weighted round robin (WRR), shaped round robin (SRR), and policies&lt;br /&gt;8.30&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement link fragmentation and interleaving (LFI) for Frame Relay&lt;br /&gt;8.40&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement generic traffic shaping&lt;br /&gt;8.50&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)&lt;br /&gt;8.60&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Implement Cisco AutoQoS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would be nice if someone can answer my questions.&lt;br /&gt;Will the workbook be updated in the next time to&amp;nbsp;match the v4.0 blueprint?&lt;br /&gt;Or a hint which topic wich will be relevant to v3.0 and v4.0 would help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>This is messy.</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/21665.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:30:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:21665</guid><dc:creator>tunerX</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/21665.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=21665</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This&amp;nbsp;area should be broken up into multiple sub areas, one for switching, frame relay, ... etc. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn&amp;#39;t a Reese&amp;#39;s Peanut butter cup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>14.7 - PE-CE routing with OSPF</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/59421.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:22:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:59421</guid><dc:creator>barhar</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/59421.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=59421</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution provided for task 14.7 seems to be inaccurate, at least it makes me very confused.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;configuring summary-address on R6 does not remove the BGP route to 172.16.8.8/32 received from R5. If only SW1 will see a /16 summary it makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the solution-part it is stated that &amp;quot;If a router receives a summary-LSA with the down bit set on an interface that belongs to VRF, it simply drops this SLA&amp;quot;. SW1 will indeed drop this LSA if it is an LSA type 3, but R6 will send the summary 172.16.0.0/16 as LSA type 5, not 3. This is simply not an issue with the summary-address configuration on R6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, if the summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 is configured on R5, R6 will redistribute this as an LSA3 to SW1, and the down bit check on LSA type 3 on SW1 is&amp;nbsp;definitely an issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baard&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>MPLS-VPN section</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/54350.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:31:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:54350</guid><dc:creator>mx_krzak</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/54350.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=54350</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi guys&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found AToM and L2TPv3 in Vol I. It doesn&amp;#39;t fit for me to blueprint v4.0 requirements. Can someone clarify me about that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;best&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Workbook Vol I Topologies</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/48094.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:35:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:48094</guid><dc:creator>ekalisek</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/48094.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=48094</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to download the physical&amp;nbsp;wiring diagrams&amp;nbsp;for the Volume I v5.0 workbook. The link for the CCIE v4.0 topology appears to bring up the diagram for Workbook II. Are the topologies the same for both workbooks? Also, the initial config for BB1 shows 10 serial interfaces; however, the hardware specification document lists only 1 ethernet interface. Any guidance on how this should be configured would be appreciated. I am trying to reproduce the environment in dynamips if this has any impact on the setup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamips Configuration - Full Layer 2 Initial Configurations</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/46876.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:39:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:46876</guid><dc:creator>cyclodextrin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/46876.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=46876</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;does anybody have the updated configuration files for running Workbook Volume I Version 5 within Dynamips? &amp;nbsp;In particular I&amp;#39;m looking at the &amp;#39;Full Layer 2 Initial Configurations&amp;#39;, straight forward to rename the FastEthernet0/x interfaces to FastEthernet1/x however the C3640 with the switch module installed do not have interface from F1/13 - 21&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cyclodextrin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>physical vs logical toplogies and initial device configurations...</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/39096.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:12:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:39096</guid><dc:creator>NMODI</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/39096.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=39096</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p class="ForumPostContentText"&gt;What do you mean by Physical and logical topologies???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="ForumPostContentText"&gt;I have just started ppreparing for the lab ...using Dynamips now....can someone please tell me how everything is setup...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="ForumPostContentText"&gt;I see some topology diagrams and device initial configurations under my IE&amp;nbsp;account for every lab workbook....questions I have:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="ForumPostContentText"&gt;&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What is the difference between physical and logical cabling digram....I assume Physical WAN cabling diagram is how all the devices are physically connected using a Frame Relay cloud...this Frame Relay cloud is built using a number of switches right?? The physical LAN cabling diagram is how the deives are connected in the LAN...the switches seem to connected in a full-mesh....what that ... &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;How can I distinguish the Physical LAN/WAN diagram from the Logical diagram.....in the lab we&amp;#39;ll be given only the logical correct??? so we simply follow the logical digrams for all out lab configurations....we dont really care about how the devices are phyically wired right??? &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The troubleshooting sections ...do they have have a different logical digram in the lab??? &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The initial device configurations are ones that are devices come prelaoded with right??? so basically all the wiring and logical designs are set...you are given scenarios and tasks that need to be completed during the exam...&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Are the physical and logical diagrams same for Vol1 and vol2 workbook labs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="CLEAR:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PLEASE READ</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31521.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:55:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:31521</guid><dc:creator>IPv6Freely</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31521.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=31521</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;INE people... PLEASE READ the posts in this section of the forums... it&amp;#39;s really frustrating getting no reply!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>workaround for switches in dynamips</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/24842.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:38:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:24842</guid><dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/24842.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=24842</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT:0px;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#444444;"&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;while trying to do RIP lab&amp;nbsp;(Volume 1 Version 5.0) on Dynamips, some switching commands cannot be used. Like VTP, swtichport host, switchport mode dynamic desirable&amp;nbsp;and ethernet channel&amp;nbsp;between sw02 and&amp;nbsp;sw04. Can you please advise what is the workaround for ethernet channel between sw02 and sw04 and&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;other swithcing commands.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT:0px;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#444444;"&gt;! ./rip/Rack1/sw2&lt;br /&gt;vtp domain cisco&amp;nbsp; ---------------------&amp;gt; cannot add&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;switchport host&amp;nbsp; -------------------&amp;gt; cannot add&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#444444;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;switchport mode dynamic desirable&amp;nbsp; --------&amp;gt; cannot add&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;channel-group 1 mode on&amp;nbsp; ----------&amp;gt; cannot add&lt;br /&gt;!&lt;br /&gt;interface Port-Channel1&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ip address 155.1.108.8 255.255.255.0&amp;nbsp; ----&amp;gt; cannot add, Ip address cannot be configured on L2 Link&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#444444;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT:0px;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#444444;"&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; regards.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lab Configuration inconsistency </title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31445.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:43:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:31445</guid><dc:creator>alexdersch</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31445.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=31445</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i believe there is a inconsistency in the configuration around R6 Switch2 and Switch4. in the initial configuration for the R6 there is only one FastEthernet configured. In the Physical LAN Cabeling you&amp;#39;ll find two connections. One to the Switch2 and one to the Switch4. Since there is no configuration for the fa0/6 on the Switch4 i assume this connection is not used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you please confirm my assumptions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much in advanced&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alex&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>lab</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31203.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:31203</guid><dc:creator>configt</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/31203.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=31203</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I am wondering which config to load for each of the Ver 5 Vol 1 labs? Some of them like basic ip addressing , eigrp etc is available on graded labs rackes but not for all labs. Anyone has any idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>John Senkiw is out of the office.</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/20869.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:04:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:20869</guid><dc:creator>John Senkiw</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/20869.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=20869</wfw:commentRss><description>I will be out of the office starting  14/04/2009 and will not return until&lt;br /&gt;
15/04/2009.</description></item><item><title>Hardware Layout for Workbook I and Workbook II initial configs</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/30589.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:25:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:30589</guid><dc:creator>Elliott Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/30589.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=30589</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m getting my lab setup and I have a dedicated frame-relay-switch router (2522) and I also have a dedicated BB1 (2620) I&amp;#39;ve noticed they combined the &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;two on a 2522 router. I don&amp;#39;t want to do that. I noticed under bb1 Configuration under serial 6 there is quite a difference on the config rather than the&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;frame-relay map statements. How can I adjust all this so it works while I do my labs. Beginning workbook I now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RIP 4.10 Route install.</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/25117.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:35:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:25117</guid><dc:creator>David Sudjiman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/25117.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=25117</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi All,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rack1R4(config-if)#do sh ip route | i 30.0.0.0&lt;br /&gt;
      30.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks&lt;br /&gt;
R       30.0.0.0/16 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:01, Ethernet0/0&lt;br /&gt;
R       30.0.0.0/14 [120/3] via 155.1.0.5, 00:00:00, Serial1/0.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the long and detailed explanation given on the WB, I&amp;#39;m just  &lt;br /&gt;
wondering why would RIP still install 30.0.0.0/14 while 30.0.0.0/16 is  &lt;br /&gt;
better (longer matching prefixes and lowest metric)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thx&lt;br /&gt;
David Sudjiman&lt;br /&gt;
www.davidsudjiman.info</description></item><item><title>WB1-Ver5-Security-11.13-TCP Intercept</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/17592.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:35:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:17592</guid><dc:creator>ketsha</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/17592.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=17592</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Task requires configuring R6 to protect WWW servers on VLAN 146 from a SYN flood attack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WB shows the following solution:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;access-list 146 permit ip any 155.1.146.0 0.0.0.255&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, because the task mentioned protect WWW servers, I configured ACL 146 as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;access-list 146 permit tcp any 155.1.146.0 0.0.0.255 eq www syn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this right? Do I need to be as much specific? Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>workbook vs solution guide </title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/24602.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:59:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:24602</guid><dc:creator>jguagliata</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/24602.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=24602</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure how others go through the workbook but I use the solution guide exclusively. I will read the task from the solution guide, complete the task, and then scroll down and check my answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My complaint is the taks in the solution guide differ from the taks in the workbook. BGP 7.12 is the perfect example of this. Also, it would be great if the reload devices and apply x configuration was part of the task in the solution guide. Below is the 7.12 task from the solution guide vs workbook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the workbook&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7.12 iBGP Synchronization&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Remove all BGP the configuration on the devices in AS 100.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Configure BGP on all internal devices, with the exception of R2, using AS&lt;br /&gt;100.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Configure iBGP peerings from R1 to all other devices in AS 100.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Configure EBGP peerings between R4 &amp;amp; BB3 and R6 &amp;amp; BB1 using their&lt;br /&gt;directly connected links; BB1 and BB3 are in AS 54.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Configure EBGP peerings between R2 &amp;amp; R3 and R2 &amp;amp; R5.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Advertise the Loopback0 interfaces of all devices into BGP.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Disable iBGP Synchronization on all devices in AS 100.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Ensure full reachability to the Loopback0 interfaces from all internal&lt;br /&gt;devices, and to all prefixes learned from AS 54 and AS 254 from all&lt;br /&gt;internal devices when sourcing traffic from the Loopback0 interfaces.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Note&lt;br /&gt;Revert all devices to the Initial BGP initial configurations prior to continuing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And here is the solution guide&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7.12 iBGP Synchronization &lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Disable iBGP Synchronization on all devices in AS 100.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Ensure full reachability to the Loopback0 interfaces from all internal&lt;br /&gt;devices, and to all prefixes learned from AS 54 and AS 254 from all&lt;br /&gt;internal devices when sourcing traffic from the Loopback0 interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Building compound Frame switch and splitting configs across routers</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23812.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:20:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:23812</guid><dc:creator>RichT</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23812.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=23812</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello all, I have a quick question I&amp;#39;m hoping someone can help me out with. I&amp;#39;m currently in the process of building out the lab. I have 2 2821s&amp;#39; that I&amp;#39;m going to use as the frame-relay switches. So I&amp;#39;m creating a compound frame switch with routers R1-R3 (3 having 2 connections) in one router and routers R4-R6 (in addition to the serial connection to BB3) on the second router. I have the tunnel and asyc interfaces all configured and working. My question is regarding splitting up the BB1.txt configuration (Internetwork Expert BB1 Initial Config Version 4.6). Since the BB1 configuration is essentially a combo of the FRS (frame relay switch) and BB1 configuration; I&amp;#39;m needing to split my routers up and create a compound FRS what if any configurations (besides the Interface specific) ones would I need to put on the other router..in my case frame-relay switch 2? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, in the main BB1.txt config we are creating loopbacks, virtual templates etc. Since I&amp;#39;m breaking my config up between 2 routers is it logical to assume that I would just need to enter any interface specific configurations on the second router that are not needed on the first (like the virtual templates that are not going to be used on my first router since serial 6 does not exist, but rather only exists on the second frame switch router). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone done this? I&amp;#39;m using 2X 2821&amp;#39;s each with 4X WIC-1DSU-T1-V2s, the AUX ports are connected via a rollover and the asyc and tunnel interfaces are defined. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, there may be a slight typo on the BB1.txt configuration. Under the example serial 1 I think the DLCI needs to be 202 not 201 as in the config (please corret me if I&amp;#39;m wrong). Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;--snip--&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;interface Serial1&lt;br /&gt;description Connected to R2&lt;br /&gt;no ip address&lt;br /&gt;encapsulation frame-relay&lt;br /&gt;clockrate 64000&lt;br /&gt;frame-relay intf-type dce&lt;br /&gt;frame-relay route &lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;201&lt;/span&gt; 202&amp;lt;----- interface Serial0 102&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;--snip--&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Initial configuration on lab...use BB1 configuration or use the FRS Initial configuration but not both?</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23492.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:36:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:23492</guid><dc:creator>RichT</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23492.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=23492</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m just wondering, and I know this has been covered over and over here. But I just want to make sure before wasting time. I&amp;#39;m consolidating my BB1 and Frame relay switches into one router (BB1). I&amp;#39;m looking at the V5 Vol 1 initial configurations. I see all the B1 - 3 inital configurations as well as the inital frame relay configurations. Now just to make sure, If i&amp;#39;m consolidating both B1 and the FRS I should just use the BB1 initial configuration (since it seems to contain both the FRS config and BB1s&amp;#39;). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Typos on point 1.38 Storm Control</title><link>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23002.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 08:19:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">70ab88a9-e3d9-4d6a-8cba-3244b4d44f3d:23002</guid><dc:creator>David Sudjiman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/23002.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://ieoc.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=86&amp;PostID=23002</wfw:commentRss><description>IEWB-RS-VOL-I-V5.Section.1.Bridging.and.Switching.1.04.005.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
1.38 Storm Control Page 10&lt;br /&gt;
Configure SW1 to limit broadcast traffic received from R6 to 100Mbps.&lt;br /&gt;
should be&lt;br /&gt;
Configure SW2 to limit broadcast traffic received from R6 to 100Mbps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Configure SW1 to limit broadcast traffic received from R4 to 1Mbps  &lt;br /&gt;
using a relative percentage of the interface bandwidth.&lt;br /&gt;
should be&lt;br /&gt;
Configure SW4 to limit broadcast traffic received from R4 to 1Mbps  &lt;br /&gt;
using a relative percentage of the interface bandwidth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thx&lt;br /&gt;
David Sudjiman&lt;br /&gt;
www.davidsudjiman.info</description></item></channel></rss>