Thanks Jent for the response. I am still a little confused. Here is a more descriptive explanation of the setup.
PE1(R5)----------------------PE2(R4)---------------PE3(R2)
| | /
CE1(R6) CE2(R8,vrf-lite)
R6 advertises 192.6.6.6 via OSPF.
On R5
Rack1R5(config)#do sh ip route vrf VPN_A
O 192.6.6.6 [110/2] via 192.56.1.6, 11:02:29, Virtual-Access1.1
Rack1R5(config)#do sh ip ospf data
OSPF Router with ID (192.56.1.5) (Process ID 1001)
Router Link States (Area 51)
Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count
192.6.6.6 192.6.6.6 1631 0x80000026 0x008BEF 3
On R4
Rack1R4# sh ip route vrf VPN_A
B 192.6.6.6 [200/2] via 27.1.5.5, 12:51:53
Rack1R4#sh ip ospf database summary
OSPF Router with ID (204.84.1.4) (Process ID 1002)
OSPF Router with ID (192.48.1.4) (Process ID 1001)
Summary Net Link States (Area 51)
LS age: 23
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC, Downward) <<<< I see the down bit set
LS Type: Summary Links(Network)
Link State ID: 192.6.6.6 (summary Network Number)
Advertising Router: 192.48.1.4
LS Seq Number: 80000018
Checksum: 0xEFEA
Length: 28
Network Mask: /32
TOS: 0 Metric: 2
So on R4 I do see the network in the OSPF database with the down bit set. I also understand that the down bit is set so that R2 does not redistribute this route back into MP-BGP once it learns it from R8. My question is why doesn't R8 put it in the routing table without "capability vrf-lite"? I thought the down bit was to prevent a PE from redistributing an OSPF route with the down bit set back into MP_BGP.
With "capability vrf-lite" configured
Rack1R8#sh ip ospf database summary
OSPF Router with ID (204.84.1.8) (Process ID 1002)
OSPF Router with ID (192.48.1.8) (Process ID 1001)
Summary Net Link States (Area 51)
Routing Bit Set on this LSA
LS age: 234
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC, Downward)
LS Type: Summary Links(Network)
Link State ID: 192.6.6.6 (summary Network Number)
Advertising Router: 192.48.1.4
LS Seq Number: 80000018
Checksum: 0xEFEA
Length: 28
Network Mask: /32
TOS: 0 Metric: 2
Rack1R8#sh ip route vrf VPN_A
O IA 192.6.6.6 [110/3] via 192.48.1.4, 12:56:29, Vlan48
[110/3] via 192.10.1.2, 12:56:29, Vlan192
Without "capability vrf-lite" configured, notice 192.6.6.6 is in the OSPF database, but not in the routing table.
Rack1R8#sh ip route vrf VPN_A
Routing Table: VPN_A
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
51.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 51.51.51.51 [110/20] via 192.10.1.254, 00:00:05, Vlan192
54.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 54.1.1.0 [110/20] via 192.48.1.4, 00:00:05, Vlan48
[110/20] via 192.10.1.2, 00:00:05, Vlan192
C 192.10.1.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan192
C 192.48.1.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan48
O E2 212.18.0.0/22 [110/20] via 192.48.1.4, 00:00:05, Vlan48
[110/20] via 192.10.1.2, 00:00:05, Vlan192
Rack1R8#sh ip ospf database summary
OSPF Router with ID (204.84.1.8) (Process ID 1002)
OSPF Router with ID (192.48.1.8) (Process ID 1001)
Summary Net Link States (Area 51)
LS age: 422
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC, Downward)
LS Type: Summary Links(Network)
Link State ID: 192.6.6.6 (summary Network Number)
Advertising Router: 192.48.1.4
LS Seq Number: 80000018
Checksum: 0xEFEA
Length: 28
Network Mask: /32
TOS: 0 Metric: 2
Many thanks in advance!