in

IEOC - Internetwork Expert's Online Community

Welcome to Internetwork Expert's Online Community - IEOC - a place for CCIE and CCENT candidates to connect, share, and learn. Our Online Community features CCIE forums and discussions for all tracks including Routing & Switching, Voice, Security, Service Provider, and Storage. Through these online communities you can discuss your questions with thousands of your peers, hundreds of CCIE's and Internetwork Expert's own team of world renowned CCIE instructors and authors, Brian Dennis - Quintuple CCIE #2210, Scott Morris - Quad CCIE #4713, Brian McGahan – Triple CCIE #8593, Petr Lapukhov - Quad CCIE #16379, Anthony Sequeira - CCIE #15626, Keith Barker - Dual CCIE #6783, and Marvin Greenlee - Triple CCIE #12237.
Latest post 04-12-2009 3:11 PM by cableman. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 11-29-2008 5:49 AM

    7.2 Congestion Management

    Hi,

    I noticed in the solutions for Task 7.2 that 'qos-groups' have been used on R2 and R3.

    My understanding was that these were only needed on the PE routers as the MPLS EXP cannot be matched outbound to the CE as it is stripped, hence need to match on a qos-group for any outbound to CE policy.

    Can you explain why qos-groups were used on R3 and R2 when they could have just simply matched on the topmost MPLS EXP bit outbound? Also they are not used at all on the PE routers R4 and R6 where I believe they should be in order to apply correct outbound policy

    Also, I noticed that FRTS was used to shape rather than drop but again implementation is inconsistent:

    • R1 has shaping outbound on all its FR interfaces
    • R2 has shaping configured to both R1 and to R3.
    • R3 has no shaping configured anywhere.
    • R2 has no shaping configured to R6.
    • R6 has no shaping configured outbound to R2.

    Could you provide some clarification of the reasoning behind the sporadic use of FRTS here - I would have thought all should use it to meet the question requirements (and on the non-FR links to use 'shape' command in CBWFQ)?

    Thanks in advance

    CCIE R&S #17416

    • Post Points: 5
  • 11-30-2008 6:48 AM In reply to

    Re: 7.2 Congestion Management

    Just noticed that the old forum entries have been moved to the IEOC so please ignore the above - these issues have been raised and answered in the relevant section of the old forums

    CCIE R&S #17416

    • Post Points: 20
  • 03-20-2009 1:07 PM In reply to

    Re: 7.2 Congestion Management

    Hi PKG,

     

    Can you post the link of old discussion about the topic?

     

    thanks

    Dev

    Dev Patel

    CCIE# 24801 (SP)

    • Post Points: 20
  • 04-12-2009 3:11 PM In reply to

    Re: 7.2 Congestion Management

    Here is the link: http://ieoc.com/forums/t/766.aspx

    Brian's answer is the following: "There can be cases where the transport label has a different EXP value than the VPN label, so using the QoS group ensures that you are doing the QoS based on the transport label."

     

     

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
IEOC CCIE Forums Internetwork Expert CCIE Training
About IEOC | Terms of Use | RSS | Privacy Policy
© 2010 Internetwork Expert, Inc. All Rights Reserved