IEOC - INE's Online Community

Welcome to INE's Online Community - IEOC - a place for CCIE and CCENT candidates to connect, share, and learn. Our Online Community features CCIE forums and discussions for all tracks including Routing & Switching, Voice, Security, Service Provider, Wireless,, and Storage. Through these online communities you can discuss your questions with thousands of your peers, hundreds of CCIE's and INE's own team of world renowned CCIE instructors and authors, Brian Dennis - Quintuple CCIE #2210, Brian McGahan – Triple CCIE #8593, Petr Lapukhov - Quad CCIE #16379, and Mark Snow - Dual CCIE #14073.
Latest post 07-01-2008 8:00 AM by Internetwork Expert Archive. 0 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-01-2008 8:00 AM

    Task 4.2 NAT-T

    Locked Contact

    Now that's a challenging task, isn't it? At least for me it was - alone the idea of this double-nat to separate the policies! \:\) I had to look in the solution-guide for that.

    I found that NAT-T is not needed there, though. I thought (and my tests support this) that NAT-T is only needed if there is PAT used. This is valid if you use any ESP-variant (like in this task). Only if you use AH, you need NAT-T with normal static NAT, too. Can anyone confirm that?

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
IEOC CCIE Forums Internetwork Expert CCIE Training
About IEOC | Terms of Use | RSS | Privacy Policy
© 2010 Internetwork Expert, Inc. All Rights Reserved