I don't want to 'pile-on' with any negativity, but I do have some feedback as well. I have watched all of the videos put out so far and I am a bit concerned about the direction the ATC course is taking.
The Old V3 ATC course:
The old ATC CoD (Brian Dennis & Brian McGahan) is intense. At times, it was like I walked into a movie like "The Matrix" as it was about halfway through, and it would go from very basic in nature to way over my head. What I mean is that I really could not sit and watch the videos and really be able to follow along with just watching them. I would get lost in the first 15 minutes and my overloaded mind would start to wonder. Then I decided to load up the same base configs and type in my rack and follow right along with what they were explaining. That is when I really went from the CCNP level up to a CCIE level of thinking.
In the old ATC CoD, the gap in the product is that there is a big disconnect between the depth of information covered in the videos as compared to the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbooks. While the ATC CoD is taking the CCNP level and depth of knowledge to the whole next level, the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook is taking what is covered in the ATC CoD and multiplying that intensity by - times 256 (dumb eigrp joke).
To summarize this point - The old ATC CoD course was deeply in-depth. That is why we love it. The problem with it was that there was no table of contents to first give an overview of the subject and then provide a summary of exactly what was going to be covered. However, the depth of coverage of the subjects was truly deep enough. Still, however, no matter how deep the old ATC CoD was, it still left a pretty significant gap between where the ATC CoD left off, and where the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbooks start.
The New V4 ATC course:
The positives - The structured approach to listing topics by specific technology is a definite improvement. Anthony and Keith are a bit more entertaining, and I really love being able to slide that little bar back and forth, as it is much easier than the other adobe 'webex like' capture tool that was used for the old one.
The Negatives -
1. In a nutshell - it's WAY too light. Way too light. If there is a gap between the old ATC CoD course and the Ver 5, Vol1 workbook...this would widen the gap from the old one being on opposite sides of the country, to the gap being on opposite sides of the world.
2. The amount of command-line diving was 80/20 to the slides. The 80% is where the .ppt slides were winning.
3. I never did see a debug issued. One of the best things that the old ATC CoD did was remove the fear of getting down to the debug level of thinking in order to figure out why something was not working.
4. Take the spanning-tree video (802.1D). In the old CoD, there was several hours of deep command-line diving, and scenarios based at the CCIE level. This spanning-tree video is maybe a couple of minutes longer than the Written Bootcamp video on 802.1D spanning-tree. In fact, I don't even think that this video was even an hour.
My opinion on a perfect ATC CoD and Ver 5, Vol 1 world:
1. I think if the direction of providing a much watered down ATC CoD course is something you guys feel compelled to do, then there has to be something to address the gap between even the old ATC CoD and the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook. Based on the Switching and Frame videos put out for the new ATC CoD class, you guys are making this gap much wider, rather than closing it.
If the direction you guys are taking is to provide this very watered down version of the ATC CoD course for part 1, and then part 2 will be a companion Video series that goes over every part of the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook, then that would make perfect sense and I think would close the gap completely. If, however, this is not the direction you are going, then I would like the option to purchase a DVD of the old ATC CoD videos and will use that as my primary study videos, along with the old OLS deep dives that Brian McGahan was doing.
I know you guys are working hard to change the product, and I truly appreciate the efforts. I also want to state that I am not fearful of change, as I welcome it. The issue here is that I think the ATC CoD is taking a step backwards here. If the goal is to make this product take a step backwards in intensity, and then to follow-up with a Video Companion to the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook, then I would really love that.
What I don't want to see is that this ATC CoD product get so watered down that it is like CCNA material as compared to the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook, and then you try to charge me any more money for a Video Companion course for the Ver 5, Vol 1 workbook.
Please understand that this feedback I provide is not meant to slam anyone or to complain. I am only providing this feedback to give an end customer's point of view. My employer went with a competitor's product for the R&S CCIE program. I have spent my own money on the CCIE 2.0 program, built a home rack to the V5 specs, and have close to 800 tokens. I deeply care about my investment in your products and company, and I want to continue to put my reputation on the line by recommending your CCIE 2.0/4.0 product to everyone I know that is pursuing the R&S CCIE. Those are the only reasons that I am providing this feedback.
And that is my two cents!
Chewie